Refine your search
Collections
Co-Authors
Year
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z All
Rajasingh, S.
- The Hadrian Wall Divide:Perceptual Difference between Industry and Academic Leaders on the Quality of Higher Education
Abstract Views :160 |
PDF Views:77
Authors
Affiliations
1 National Engineering College, Kovilpatti, IN
2 Manonmaniam Sundaranar University, Department of Management Studies, Tirunelveli, IN
1 National Engineering College, Kovilpatti, IN
2 Manonmaniam Sundaranar University, Department of Management Studies, Tirunelveli, IN
Source
DHARANA - Bhavan's International Journal of Business, Vol 5, No 2 (2011), Pagination: 101-112Abstract
Higher Education portals in India are expected to deliver quality outcomes to the stakeholders namely Industry, Public and Higher Educational Institutions. But the expectation of the Leaders of various sectors has a different perspective towards these outcomes. This paper proposes to address the Gap in the quality perceptions of the Leaders of academia and Industry sectors. It will divulge the perceptual divide between the academia and the Industry leaders with respect to the quality outcomes of the students and the teaching faculty. This in turn will ably support the policymakers (The Govt.) and the Higher Educational Leaders to design and implement best practices in Higher Educational Institutions. This will result in quality education which will be in line with the expectations/perceptions of the Industry Leaders. Consequently it will streamline the education process in tune with the demand for quality students in the Globalised environment.Full Text
References
- Brennan, J., Fedrowitz, J., Huber, M., and Shah, T. (Eds.). (1999). What kind of university? International perspectives on knowledge, participation and governance. Buckingham UK: Open University Press with Society for Research into Higher Education.
- Green, Diana, Ed, What is Quality in Higher Education? Society for Research into Higher Education Ltd, London.
- Cave, M., and Hanney, S. (1992). Performance indicators. In B. R. Clark and G. R. Neave (Eds.) The encyclopedia of higher education (pp. 1411-1423). Oxford: Pergamon Press.
- Nadeau, G. G., Donald, J. G., and Konrad, A. (1992, April). Criteria and indicators of quality and excellence in Canadian colleges and universities. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco.
- Baird, J. R. (1988). Quality: What should make higher education "higher"? Higher Education Research and Development, 7, 141-152.
- Barnett, R. (1988). Entry and exit performance indicators for higher education: Some policy and research issues. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 13, 16-30.
- Dey, E. L., Astin, A. W., and Korn, W. S. (1991). The Amiierican freshman: Twenty-five year trends, 1966-1990. Los Angeles: Higher Education Research Institute, Graduate School of Education, University of California.
- Astin, A. W. (1985). Achieving educational excellence: A critical assessment of priorities and practices in higher education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
- Cave, M., and Hanney, S. (1992). Performance indicators. In B. R. Clark & G. R. Neave (Eds.) The encyclopedia of higher education (pp. 1411-1423). Oxford: Pergamon Press.
- Donald, J. G., and Denison, D. B. (1993, June). Criteria and indicators for quality and excellence in Canadian colleges and universities: The student domain. In Criteria and indicators of quality and excellence in Canadian colleges and universities. Symposium conducted at the annual meeting of the Canadian Society for the Study of Higher Education, Ottawa, ON.
- Chickering, A. W., and Reisser, L. (1993). Education and identity (2nd ed.). San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
- Linstone, H. A., and Turoff, M. (1975). The Delphi method: Techniques and applications. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
- Janet G. Donald and D. Brian Denison, Quality Assessment of University Students “Student Perceptions of Quality Criteria”, The Journal of Higher Education, Vol. 72, No. 4 (July/August 2001).